The food industry developed this voluntary label itself

The food industry developed this voluntary label itself

The offender was sentenced in 2001 to ten years in prison for rape, assault and robbery. He was then placed in preventive detention in the Tegel prison since 2011.

The search is ongoing

He has been allowed to go out with escort since June 2016, and since January 2018 he has been allowed to leave the prison unaccompanied. According to the justice spokesman, the 191 exits were inconspicuous.

Breakdown prison in Berlin: prisoners fled again from Plötzensee JVA Money, violence and megalomania: Clan crime – the end of looking away Breakout with helicopter: heavily armed robbers free robbers from prison

He gave no information about where the man could be and what the background of his disappearance could be. The rapist is being searched for.

Sources used: AFP news agency

Strasbourg (dpa) – The German system for preventive detention of dangerous criminals has again proven itself before the European Court of Human Rights.

T-Online.de/TV

German nursing home causes a stir on the net

Macron reports from quarantine with a video message

MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag

This building is way more famous than it looks

Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery

Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes

US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona

NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars

These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden

Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine

Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament

Suddenly there is no stopping the minister

Container use due to Corona causes a stir

Towing service has a bad surprise

Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast

A convicted murderer from Germany, who saw his human rights violated by his preventive detention, finally failed before the Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg Court (complaint numbers 10211/12 and 27505/14).

The applicant murdered a jogger in Lower Bavaria in 1997 at the age of 19. Since the end of his juvenile detention in 2008, he has been in preventive detention, currently in Straubing, Bavaria.

Dozens of bumps on Saturday: swarm quake makes the earth tremble in Vogtland Sauerland: Fatal accident in the sawmill: employee trapped Attack in Saarland: wild boar seriously injures man in his living room Podcast on IS: “New York Times” falls for impostors

The German courts had adequately demonstrated by means of expert reports that the man suffered from sexual sadism and could commit further crimes in freedom, the court argued. His preventive detention was therefore not arbitrary and did not violate the right to freedom. The judges also emphasized that the man’s placement was primarily aimed at treating his mental disorder. His preventive detention was therefore not to be regarded as a punishment – the principle of “no punishment without a law” was not violated.

The German system for preventive detention was adjusted in 2013. The European Court of Human Rights had previously condemned Germany several times for this – among other things, because the living conditions of prisoners used to differ only insignificantly from those in the regular prison system. Most recently, the Strasbourg court had repeatedly been satisfied with the redesign.

Unlike detention, German courts do not impose preventive detention as a punishment, but as a preventive measure. It is intended to protect the population from perpetrators who have already served their sentence for a particularly serious crime but are still considered dangerous. The conditions must, however, be significantly better than in prison; One focus must be on a good range of therapies.

The Bavarian Ministry of Justice welcomed the judgment. This established legal certainty.argumentative essay about nuclear energy The Court had confirmed that the therapy concept pursued in the Straubing facility was suitable for treating the applicant. “This means that dangerous criminals can continue to be treated and accommodated under the highest security measures in Bavaria in future to protect the general public.”

A man who is said to have abused Thai children for several decades has now been convicted in Munich. He is said to have filmed and photographed the deeds. 

The District Court of Munich I sentenced a 67-year-old to a long prison sentence with subsequent preventive detention for multiple sexual abuse of Thai children. The man is expected to be in prison for 13 years and 6 months, the court announced on Friday. The defenders want to check whether they are taking action against it. The man was found guilty of 80 cases of serious sexual abuse of two boys. 

Dilapidated construction: balcony collapses – five injured Largest find in Germany: 4.5 tons of cocaine discovered on ship Alone at the wheel: 15-year-old drives a car and has a serious accident

 The man is said to have seriously abused Thai children – mostly boys – for more than 30 years. The youngest victims were just eight years old. He is said to have filmed and photographed the deeds. The man was charged with 103 cases. According to the public prosecutor’s office, more than 8,500 child pornography was found in his Munich apartment, including almost twelve hours of video material. Through his lawyer, he had made a statement in camera and essentially admitted the allegations.

How many calories, vitamins or protein does a food contain? From next year on, there will be uniform regulations within the EU for clear and legible markings on packaging. The Committee on Health and the Environment of the European Parliament spoke out in favor of this on March 16 in Brussels. Food packaging must provide consumers with detailed information on nutritional values, but not necessarily in the red, yellow or green traffic light colors. The committee rejected the “traffic light labeling” demanded by consumer advocates and doctors.

more on the subject

Food: This must be on the package

Eight values ​​instead of traffic lights

The planned EU regulation should oblige manufacturers to provide understandable information about the most important ingredients such as fat, protein, carbohydrates, sugar, salt and fiber per 100 grams or milliliters. The calorific value in kilocalories per 100 grams should be printed on the front. There are also references to industrially produced hydrogenated fats, which are considered to be particularly harmful to health. These eight values ​​are referred to as the “Big eight” in the food industry.

Indications of origin for meat, milk, fruit and vegetables

The origin of meat, fruits, vegetables and dairy products should be indicated. A special note is provided for foods that have been genetically modified or treated with nanoparticles. The committee also wants to improve the information for allergy sufferers. A special regulation is to be drawn up for alcoholic beverages.

Soon clear indications of analog cheese?

The planned EU regulation also includes information on the use-by date, the manufacturer or whether it is an imitation, such as cheese made from plant substances. This type of imitation cheese is widespread in finished products such as pizza, snacks or baked goods and made headlines last year as an analog cheese.

“Not a label for every praline”

It is controversial in Parliament as well as among the Member States whether the regulation should only apply to packaged products or also to bread from the baker, meat from the butcher or delicatessen – which is only packaged at the point of sale. The responsible MP Renate Sommer (CDU) spoke out against it: “Otherwise there would have to be a label next to every praline, that won’t work.” In the opinion of the MPs, the rules should not apply to small and medium-sized companies with fewer than 100 employees and total assets of less than five million euros.

Fierce argument about the food traffic light

The information on fat and sugar content – for example in biscuits and mueslis – is intended in particular to help combat the growing obesity among children. But whether the now planned labeling can achieve this goal, a bitter dispute raged for months between consumer advocates, doctors, the food industry, politicians and experts from different camps. Consumer advocates, health insurances – and immediately before the committee meeting, paediatricians from all over Europe – had called for traffic lights. For example, particularly sweet and fatty foods would have received a red point, and healthy goods a green point. In contrast, the food industry made mobile. The traffic light is too simple, lacks any scientific basis and misleads consumers, warn large corporations such as Kraft Foods Germany, Kelogg Germany, Danone or Coca-Cola in Germany.

Aigner supports the decision of the EU committee

Federal Consumer Minister Ilse Aigner (CSU) supports the recommendation of the EU Health Committee. “In the future, labeling will be mandatory for all food,” said Aigner of the German press agency dpa. “In order for consumers to have a balanced and healthy diet, they need to know how high the energy content and nutritional values ​​of food are.”

Proponents of traffic lights are not giving up yet

The proponents of the traffic light are not defeated – especially since the vote in the committee with 30 yes and 31 no votes was extremely tight. In May, the plenary session of the EU parliament will vote on the planned regulation, after which it will be the turn of the Council of Ministers, in which the 27 EU states are represented.

The fat, sugar and salt content of food should be marked more clearly in the EU – but not with traffic light colors, as demanded by consumer advocates and doctors. The European Parliament in Strasbourg voted with a large majority for nutritional information on the basis of portions or the average daily requirement. A corresponding law could come into force from spring 2011.

more on the subject

Food: This must be on the package

Traffic light versus percentage

Frozen pizza, sachet soup, cola – which of them is healthy or unhealthy? How can consumers be warned of fattening foods when shopping? These questions have been discussed in German and European politics for years. Consumer advocates advocate the so-called food traffic light. The colors red, green and yellow indicate how high the respective proportion of the most important nutritional values ​​is in a processed food. But the traffic light did not find a majority in the EU Parliament. Instead, the energy value in calories should be clearly visible on the packaging. In addition, manufacturers should be obliged to provide clear information on a number of components such as fat, salt, sugar, protein or unsaturated fatty acids.

Criticism: Traffic light labeling is too simple

Green and left-wing MPs in particular voted in favor of the traffic light marking, which was fiercely opposed by the food industry. The conservatives, however, rejected the food traffic light. Critics find this designation too simple and not scientifically justified. After the first reading in Parliament, the proposal will now go to the Council of Ministers, in which the 27 EU states are represented. So far there is no unified position in the Council. The European Parliament has a right of codecision on the issue. Parliament and Council must therefore agree on a compromise.

Food industry enforces its own system

When it comes to labeling the nutritional values ​​of foods, the industry has long since created facts: 60 percent of all packaged foods in Europe already have rounded rectangles with gram and percentage information on the content of certain nutrient groups. The information is a guideline for the daily intake. They are mostly used with the English name “Guideline Daily Amounts” (GDA). The food industry developed this voluntary label itself. Consumer associations criticize the model as difficult to understand. You are therefore calling for the simplified labeling with traffic light colors red, yellow and green.

What the GDA label says

The GDA labeling on the front of food often only contains information on the calorie content. On the back there is more detailed data on the nutritional values ​​in a total of five fields: calories, sugar content, fat, saturated fat and salt. The information relates to a specific portion of a product. The five fields show the absolute content of a certain nutrient in grams, as well as the percentage of the recommended daily amount. An adult woman with a daily consumption of 2000 kilocalories is used as the benchmark.

This obscures the nutritional values

Consumer advocates criticize the fact that the food industry usually does not give the portion information for the nutritional values ​​in meaningful and easily understandable units, but in grams. For example, instead of giving consumers the information for a biscuit, they will find the information for 30 grams of biscuit on the packaging. This makes it more difficult to quickly determine the nutritional value of a product. In addition, consumer advocates also criticize the fact that the calorie consumption of an adult woman is used as a benchmark.

Bad Honnef (dpa / tmn) – Garden owners must ensure the stability of their trees. However, laypeople cannot always estimate this with mere visual appearance.

Current survey: These are the favorite vegetables of the German dried flowers are trendy in the bridal bouquet. Easy-care medicinal plant: The healing power of aloe vera Tinsel substitute: Decorate the Christmas tree with straw.

“Even if a tree still looks vital and juicy from the outside, a fungus can have nested in its roots or in the trunk, which softens the wood structures,” explains Wolfgang Groß from the Federal Association of Gardening and Landscaping (BGL). “In a strong storm, a tree like this can tip over like a match, even though you can’t tell from the outside.” He recommends inspections by experts at regular intervals.